Tuesday, October 23, 2007

BIGFOOT SIGHTING -- "THE JACOBS CREATURE"

Last October I told my wife Kamala that by the end of next year, I am willing to bet that there will be some new photographs or video footage of a sasquatch that will have people scratching their heads. Everyone's carrying cameras these days, be it on their cellular telephone machines or compact cameras. Here's the latest head-scratching evidence of North America's primate:

This is one of two photos (there may be more) taken by deer hunter R. Jacobs on Sept. 16th who placed his motion-sensing camera (with infra-red flash) behind his house to photograph deer that might be using the trail. Be sure to read the full article from the BFRO here!!! Very exciting news for Bigfoot researchers and scientists everywhere.

Finally some photos that are not some kind of "blobsquatch." Someone mentions in the BFRO comments that the creature looks to be taking the form of a felled tree stump. This is quite relevant in that a number of years ago, Andrew Duncan, Craig McEwen and I went on a sasquatch hunting trip with a hunter who claims to have seen many sasquatches. He told us that one time he saw one try to hide itself by crouching and splaying its arms and hands out to its side in order to resemble a tree stump. He said it would have been very effective had he not seen the creature do this.

I'm looking forward to following this further and will let you know what's going on! Hey, Jane Goodall thinks there's enough evidence for sasquatch's existence.

15 comments:

joerepjr said...

well Me and my two friend came across this creature 2 years ago but were unable to get a photo... but the sighting was reported on bigfootforums.com. the true name of the beast is the Benezette Banchee for the erie scream it makes.

joerepjr said...

well me and my two friends first discovered the creature two years ago. we sighted it while watching elk in Benezette, PA. that when we named it the original "Benezette Banchee" which comes from the name of the town. this was originally posted on Bigfootforums.com under the screen name Happyfoot, look it up!

joerepjr said...

well here is the link to the original post in october of 2004 where the name Benezette Banchee was "coined". http://www.bigfootforums.com/ the post is under sightings and encounters. originally posted by happyfoot.

Anonymous said...

Ill say this, I didnt believe in an unidentified flying object until I saw just that with my own two eyes, my daughter brother and sister also saw it so I know Im not crazy, as for the Bigfoot Id have to say that it looks strange to me and I dont think anyone has a right to claim it to be anything, not a bear or a bigfoot until someone actually finds a bigfoot corpse or captures a live bigfoot, this also goes for the people who are saying its a bear, come on, lets get reall, this thing is no bear.

Anonymous said...

I could tell from the beginning of this story when I first seen the pictures it was no bear. I could not understand why it took so long to prove it. You could just see the arms and legs were too long. I live in this area and its frustrating because the Pennsylvania Game Commision is always trying to cover up the truth.

Burlfinder said...

I seen the pictures when they first were released to the public and they caught my attention. I admit I was a bit skeptical, but as time has passed and more information came out I now believe they are of an actual young bigfoot. I was fascinated with the limb to torso measurements that were compared to bears. Then when I read how the investigations following the photos revealed a couple eye witness encounters. I seen parts that should be covered by a tail if it was a bear, a possible face, and even some possible hidden toes I knew he was the real thing.

Anonymous said...

This isn't a bear it has to be some kind of ape that escaped from a zoo or someones pet. If they ever prove Bigfooot is real I'll agree that this is a young one.

Anonymous said...

These creatures survive from an ancestor called gigantipithicus a real Sasquatch thought to be extinct.Their ability to hide comes from years of adaptation as our technology advances.

Anonymous said...

http://www.vimeo.com/6367515
This link tells the whole story very well.

Johnny Darrell said...

Sorry, but that link doesn't explain the whole thing very well. Like I've been saying all along: I want this to be a juvysquatch but there's more weight on it being a bear and if you look at another post, i've clearly shown how you can see that it has a bear's head.

disa said...

月見草油,中油,汽油,油壓,苦茶油,機器,蔥油餅,加油站,油價,中油,油價查詢,升降機,指甲油,油漆,拖板車,油壓,汽油,加油站,加油,橄欖油,三酸甘油脂,加油站,椰子油,指油壓,加油站,原油價格,海豹油,油桐花坊,吸油機,加油站,雲南婆婆,姑婆芋,大老婆,老婆,老婆,青蛙,歌詞,婆羅花,論壇,坐月子,阿龐,老婆大人,月子餐,老大,孕婦,老婆,渡假屋,趙樹海,大嬸婆,汽機車,冠佑,老婆餅,鶯歌,阿婆,吉祥話,阿婆冰,屈中恆,婆婆,虎姑婆,影片,花蓮民宿,花旗銀行,流星花園,流星,桃花運,花蓮旅遊,花蓮,花旗,流星花園,海洋公園

Anonymous said...

i don't really believe in sasquatch until they capture one but that was no bear- it's a chimp or a human

Anonymous said...

Is Bigfoot Real or fake? For over 400 a long time, there have been reporting’s of a man like beast that is certainly absolutely coated in hair.
[url=http://www.is-bigfoot-real.com/]bigfoot[/url]

Anonymous said...

Is Bigfoot True or mock? For over 4 hundred a long time, there have been reporting’s of a man like monster that may be absolutely coated in hair.
[url=http://www.is-bigfoot-real.com/]bigfoot videos[/url]

Anonymous said...

I still think it was a bigfoot Bushnell had Biologists look at the original photo from the camera and they said it was not a bear. Then when some scientists from Duke worked out the size with models it had 22 inch arms and a 18 inch long body that's impossible for a bear. Bear proportioned models didn't fit at the location when filmed with the game camera.